« Previous
Next »
Seminars in Radiation Oncology
Volume 22, Issue 1
, Pages
3-10
, January 2012
Quality, Technology and Outcomes: Evolution and Evaluation of New Treatments and/or New Technology
-
(A) Four-field box plan for the prostate, 2-D planning. (B) Nonaxial 4-field prostate plan, 3-D planning. (C) Seven-field IMRT treatment of head/neck cancer, with beam intensities shown for the indivi
(A) Four-field box plan for the prostate, 2-D planning. (B) Nonaxial 4-field prostate plan, 3-D planning. (C) Seven-field IMRT treatment of head/neck cancer, with beam intensities shown for the individual beam directions.
-
Isocomplication curve 1 is used for initial treatments. If technology improves conformality of high dose (ie, less normal tissue volume) for a given patient, the prescription dose moves in the directiIsocomplication curve 1 is used for initial treatments. If technology improves conformality of high dose (ie, less normal tissue volume) for a given patient, the prescription dose moves in the direction of arrow A toward higher dose. If toxicity on curve 1 is low enough, then escalate to curve 2 (as shown by arrow B), which allows a higher treatment dose for the same volume irradiated. Technology improvement again allows motion on the isocomplication curve toward higher tumor doses.
PII: S1053-4296(11)00100-7
doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.09.009
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Seminars in Radiation Oncology
Volume 22, Issue 1
, Pages
3-10
, January 2012
