Seminars in Radiation Oncology
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 98-104, April 2008

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Copy Number Profiling: A New Tool for Translational Research in Solid Malignancies

  • José Luis Costa, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
    • Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Gerrit Meijer, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Bauke Ylstra, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Carlos Caldas, MD

      Affiliations

    • Breast Cancer Functional Genomics Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute and Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Carlos Caldas, Breast Cancer Functional Genomics Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute and Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.

The molecular genetic investigation of cancer is rapidly evolving because of ever-improving technology. Insights into cancer disease mechanisms are being elucidated using new chromosome-based biomarkers. Until recently, diagnostic and prognostic assessment of diseased tissues and tumors relied heavily on histologic indicators that permitted only general classifications into morphologic subtypes and did not take into account the alterations in individual gene expression or copy number. Genomic and expression profiling now allow the simultaneous interrogation of thousands of genes and offer unprecedented opportunities to obtain global molecular signatures of neoplastic cells in patient samples. One limitation of global profiling at the expression level is that acquisition and optimal transport of high-quality RNA is problematic because of its inherent instability in vitro. In contrast, tumor DNA is stable, relatively easy to transport, and can be obtained from archival paraffin tissue blocks. Thus, there is now a tremendous opportunity to globally profile copy number imbalances in tumors using array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), which can identify at high resolution the presence of genomic copy number changes in constitutional or tumor DNA samples. Array CGH profiling has already allowed a deeper insight into the biology of a variety of tumor types and in the near future will undoubtedly prove to be a key technology leading to better cancer classification, prognosis, and outcome prediction.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the EU-sixth framework project DISMAL (contract no. LSHC-CT-2005 to 018911). JL Costa was financially supported by a grant from “Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia” (SFRH/ BPD/ 20,370/ 2004).

PII: S1053-4296(07)00096-3

doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2007.10.005

Seminars in Radiation Oncology
Volume 18, Issue 2 , Pages 98-104, April 2008