Seminars in Radiation Oncology
Volume 17, Issue 4 , Pages 287-292, October 2007

Data Handling in Radiation Therapy in the Age of Image-Guided Radiation Therapy

  • Stuart J. Swerdloff, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Stuart J. Swerdloff, PhD, 46 Kitchener Road, Milford, North Shore City 1309, New Zealand.

Consultant to IMPAC Medical System Inc, 100 South Mathilda Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94086, and Co-Chair IHE-RO Technical Committee, ASTRO, 8280 Willow Oaks Corporate Drive, Suite 500, Fairfax, VA 22031.

Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in the modern sense includes large volumetric image sets and high-resolution planar images. In addition to the issue of the sheer size of the data under consideration in IGRT is the critical need for the data to be available in the necessary situation in a timely and reliable fashion. Standards exist for the format of much of the data needed to perform IGRT, but the information workflow is not “standardized” (formal or ad hoc) and details of the use of the standards are only recently being constrained to ensure interoperability. Depending on the interpretation of the scope of IGRT or the desired workflow of the IGRT system, not all of the information that needs to be exchanged between systems is yet standardized nor is the means to exchange the information. The organization of the different types of data needed for IGRT for easy navigation is addressed by commercially available products from multiple vendors; however, this is also an area in which standards and consistency in the clinical environment are catching up to the market. The critical questions a clinician needs answers to include the following: (1) What kinds of data will I need to store and communicate between the pieces of my IGRT system? (2) How much storage will I need to address the volumes of data produced? (3) How long do I need to store (and be able to access) the data? (4) How will the pieces of my IGRT system communicate the necessary information between them (what standards or technical frameworks apply and do the pieces conform or adhere to them)? (5) What are the time constraints on getting information from “where it is” to “where it needs to be”? and (6) Is my IGRT system as a whole capable of providing me with the workflow necessary for my clinical environment or, alternatively, what do the providers of my IGRT system need to do to enable my required workflow? The body of this article examines these issues in greater detail to enable clinicians and clinical support personnel to frame the questions in a practical manner and develop answers that assist in the successful deployment of IGRT.

Keywords: IGRT, data management, storage, workflow, DICOM

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 IMPAC Medical System Inc produces products used for the purpose addressed in the topic of this article. Stuart J. Swerdloff is a former employee of IMPAC and currently consults for them.

PII: S1053-4296(07)00063-X

doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2007.08.002

Seminars in Radiation Oncology
Volume 17, Issue 4 , Pages 287-292, October 2007